LEAGUE
DIVISION TWO BOURNEMOUTH 1 READING 0 (Half Time: 0-0) |
|
Reading Scorers:
- Bournemouth Scorers: Hayter (71 mins) |
Date:
25 September 2001 Attendance: 3,691 |
Reading: Whitehead, Murty, Williams, Whitbread, Robinson, Harper, Jones (Rougier 77), Igoe (N Smith 72), Butler, Henderson (Cureton 77), Forster. Subs not used: Ashdown, Mackie. Bournemouth:
Stewart, Howe, Maher, Tindall, Purches, Carl Fletcher, Hayter, Elliott,
Ford, Feeney (Broadhurst 84), Holmes. Subs not used: O'Connor,
Menetrier, Huck. |
Perhaps the only consistent thing about Reading this season is our inconsistency. Reading were fantastic on Saturday as they beat Wycombe Wanderers 2-0 at the Madejski Stadium - the biggest disappointment was that we didn't add to our tally of goals. We weren't even close to that tonight against Bournemouth in Dorchester's Avenue Stadium. It was a strange night all round for Reading's travelling support. The exact same team and formation weren't a patch on the side we saw just a few days before, and Reading were beaten by a very average Bournemouth side that won't be doing anything this season. The game seemed almost non-league in front of a small crowd with a nearly full away end. There was little to get excited about, but the away fans didn't make a noise as they watched in horror a non-league game of football.
Dorchester didn't even lay on ball boys and with the stands all so small the ball was either out of the ground or waiting to be retrieved every time the ball went out of play. It meant the game never flowed - perhaps about half the game was wasted waiting for the ball to be brought back into play. It didn't make things better when the linesman found the ball stopped dead at his ankles but refused to kick it back to Whitehead so he could get the game underway again. If that wasn't bad enough Danson, the referee for the night, didn't keep the game flowing when the ball was on the pitch, and seemed to want to spend the night talking to the players rather than referee a game of football. The constant breaks to play really didn't suit Reading, although neither team managed to really get going all night. It was a very poor match for certain.
Reading's passing of Saturday was gone and we looked out of practice or something as we failed to string together any decent moves. When we did it was like Stoke City all over again with the final ball failing to find a target. We weren't as bad as at Stoke City but it was close. Reading got off to the better start of the two sides but failed to keep it going - we won the first corners of the game and had a couple of shots not far off target. Whitbread put one over the bar and Forster got on the end of a cross but put the ball wide of the Bournemouth defence. We quickly stopped playing the ball around and our midfield was non-existant. Jones was doing the simple things right about with some nice simple passes, but then we looked out of ideas of what to do after that. Sure enough, after a while we started to pump balls into the air - and that really didn't help as the Bournemouth defence just cut them all out leaving our three man attack struggling to win the ball.
Down the other end Bournemouth weren't trying anything too different with all the high balls comfortably cut out by Whitbread and Williams. When Bournemouth did look dangerous it was when the played the ball forward on the ground and at speed. They probably should have taken the lead towards the end of the first half with a couple of dangerous attacks which the last man just failed to connect with. A couple of times they broke through the centre of Reading's defence and delivered the ball in to the spare man who just failed to get his foot on it.
It wasn't a suprise to see it at 0-0 at half-time. With the same set of players and formation it seemed the game plan was to sneak a couple of goals in the first half to hang onto. That hadn't worked and it clearly wasn't going to, so it was a bit of a disappointment to see no change to the tactics at half-time from Pardew. It was even more disappointing when we didn't change a thing and the second half continued as the first had. Up front Henderson, Butler, and Forster may have been working hard - but they weren't getting enough of the ball and when they did they could do nothing with it. The Bournemouth defence looked solid, but Butler perhaps should have done better with a couple of chances. Once the ball was played through well from the right into the centre of the box. Butler could have left it for Henderson who was better positioned, but didn't. He then could have knocked it to Henderson but was greedy and chose to shot. That would have been fine if he'd sent a screamer into the back of the net - but instead he poked a weak effort along the ground to the keeper. It was more like a backpass. Butler worked hard all night but is missing something up front at the moment.
With time running slowly out the turning point came when Murty went down injured for a while. When play resumed he clearly couldn't run properly and definately couldn't kick the ball. After a good five minutes he was clearly struggling. This must have been clear to the bench - he should have been replaced. It was no suprise that the only goal of the game, Bournemouth's winner, came down their left with Murty having all kinds of problems with about twenty minutes to go. The ball was played to the right and crossed into the middle, Whithead failed to get the cross properly and the ball was smacked home from close range at the far post. 1-0. Bournemouth had taken their chance and that was always going to be the final score.
To be fair to Bournemouth they could have increased their lead moments later.
As Reading looked beaten Bournemouth came forward for their best period of the
game, and a good shot from just inside the box needed a good save from Whitehead
who got down well to his left to push the ball wide, when it was heading for
the bottom corner. Reading reacted to the goal by bringing on Cureton, Rougier,
and Neil Smith. But it made no difference, Cureton didn't hardly see the ball.
Rougier couldn't get past his man and the best he did was win a few corners
that came to nothing. Smith put in a few mis-kicked passes and that was his
only real contribution. We had four minutes of injury time but we failed to
look like a team desperate for the late goal - and we really didn't deserve
one anyway.
Graham
Following report by John Wells:
Outside the ground before the game I overheard a Bournemouth fan predict that
his team would 'get stuffed this evening'. Everything pointed to a comfortable
Royals victory which is why so many Reading fans left the ground frustrated
and disappointed with the performance and the result. Towards the end of last
season Bournemouth outplayed the Royals and lost. Tonight a vastly inferior
performance brought them three points they could hardly have expected.
The small crowd was unable to generate any atmosphere, not that there was not much happening on the pitch to shout about. The formation which worked so well on Saturday did not produce the same result this evening. The first half was simply dour and dull with neither side looking like breaking the deadlock. Both defences looked secure. Reading managed to put together some neat passing, mainly on the right but chances were few and far between. Forster again posed the the greatest threat for Reading with his pace.
Reading started brightly after half time with decent attempts from Butler and Forster. Although the Royals showed plenty of commitment and controlled the game at times, they found it very difficult to break down a resolute Bournemouth defence. When Hayter scored with twenty minutes to go most Reading fans would have settled for a point - but the equaliser never looked like coming. Bournemouth got everyone behind the ball and scrapped for everything. Reading pounded away but increasingly resorted to hoofing the ball forward hopefully.
Jones and Harper worked hard in midfield. Murty, Whitbread and Williams defended with spirit and determination. The forwards were again out of sorts. None of them are performing at their best this season. Henderson found it hard to impose himself on the game against a defence that was strong in the air. Cureton looked eager to win his place back when he came on but by then Bournemouth were packing their defence and Reading were becoming hasty and careless in their build up.
Tonight's game is best forgotten. Only four points behind the leaders with
a game in hand is far from disastrous, but expectations are high this year and
Reading must not return from away games against teams in the lower half of the
division without at least a point. No doubt a point that Pardew made to his
players after the game.
John
Post
Match Opinions
|
Where do you start to describe that load of utter garbage last night?
Over 1200 Reading fans last night witnessed last night a team who are
so called favourites to win the league, yet against a team that got beat
6-0 recently and lie at the bottom of the league we managed to produce
our one and only shot on goal all night after sixty five minutes. Heard
Pardew on the radio this morning, "fair play to Bournemouth, they gave
it their best, and had nothing to lose, good luck to them"! Get real Pardew,
face the facts, the team, and nor have you, not got a clue how the break
down teams that work their bollocks off, shut us down quickly and have
giant centre backs who deal with our long ball with ease. With fifteen
minutes to go we were beaten, 1-0 nil down, where was the passion, commitment,
effort? Bloody no where that's where. We all looked at Pardew leaning
against the dug-out like a muppet, motionless, not even shouting at the
players or urging them on. Absolutely pathetic. I can't be bothered to
mention players, except that after the Cambridge game I mistakenly mentioned
we needed a new right back, I of course meant a left back, and last night
Robinson again raised his reputation to almost iconic status with another
diabolical display culminating with being nowhere yet again when the Bournemouth
goal came from the left side. One other thing, all the crap that was written
about Harper after Saturday, coming of age etc, my arse, he too was crap
last night not creating one chance and spending most of the night hiding
in midfield . Madejski should have Pardew in his office this morning and
ask him to justify that performance last night , it was totally unacceptable
and a disgrace to the travelling supporters .If it doesn't improve soon
with an acceptable level consistency and performance then he should seriously
consider his options before it's too late....... again! Why do we trudge around the country, taking time off from work to
watch such rubbish. Why go away from home and play three up front when
the three in question are not scoring goals in spades. Harper was useless
and surely needs dropping for Gamble. Harper gets lost in these type of
games and is not a suitable player for this division. With Butler's loss
of touch in front of goal he should be tried out in midfield instead of
Harper. At least he gives 100 percent. With Cureton on the bench and today
playing in a reserves match he seems out of Pardews plans. On saturday
he seemed to have lost confidence and had little opportunity at Bournemouth.
Pardew was quoted on the radio that Cureton's 25 goals will be needed
to get promotion. With a fifth of the season gone he will soon need to
score a goal a game to make an impact. I don't think Nick or Bob were watching the same game as I was. Another dismal performance and 3 lost points that could prove vital
next May. The night started badly when Nick Newbury abused Ref Durkin
with in earshot during the warm up, bang went any chance of a soft Reading
penalty - Brilliant. 443 worked well at the Mad Stad against a packed
defence but it soon became clear that against a hungry Bournemouth side
we were being overrun in midfield, Keith Jones worked manfully to stem
the flow, everybody behind the Reading goal could see it, why not the
Reading Management? How many goals do we leak down the left hand side?
Listened to the game last night... what are we doing? How can there
be such a dramatic difference in the performance against Wycombe versus
the one agaisnt Bouremouth? It goes without saying that the players need
to think long and hard about their attitude... and the management about
what they need to do to motivate this team and achieve consistent performances.
We will not win this division, we will struggle (based on these inconsistencies)
to finish second, so its a case of the play-offs again (maybe!). I'm not
especially a knocker of Alan Pardew, but its concerning hearing him say
that on the one hand our team lacks quality... when on other occasions,
he's stated we have quality but lacked commitment/desire? What's the problem
here? Most Reading fans and neutrals if you talk to them feel Reading
have quality players in key positions (bar Robinson), so how can we come
away from games like the one last against lowly opposition and create
so few chances and fail. West Ham was nice, and a result against Villa
would be too, .but in the grand scheme of things I could'nt care less
what happens in that competition... going up is what matters... end of
story, and Pardew, Allen, and the team need to get focused on that simple
fact and now! For Spirit, Tenacity, Flair read Hope, Hoof and Apathy, and that will
sum up last nights dismal performance. |
Got
an Opinion?
|
Comment
on this, or any Royals match - email opinion@royals.org
Appropriate submissions will appear on match report pages! |
Copyright
Hob Nob Anyone? © 1994-2001
The Original
Reading Football Club Internet Site